Know what’s in the asset before the crew opens it.
HazardIQ checks each work order against your hazardous-materials register and returns HOLD, CAUTION or CLEAR before work starts, with the reason and the evidence.
Adapters for SAP S/4HANA PM, IBM Maximo and TechnologyOne, or use it standalone.
Start with the question on your desk.
Each role has a different reason to care. Pick yours for the short version and the next step.
Can we show we checked before work began?
A live view of high-risk items, overdue reviews and work orders on HOLD, each backed by a record you can verify.
The executive view → WHS & complianceCan I produce the register, plan and proof on request?
Statutory register, management plan and clearance PDFs from live data, with every check kept as evidence.
The WHS view → Asset & engineeringWhat is in this asset, and how far can I trust the data?
Hazards on your functional-location hierarchy, scored for data quality, with survey gaps made visible.
The asset view → Maintenance & planningIs this job safe to release today?
Each work order returns HOLD, CAUTION or CLEAR in the system you already use, with the reason in plain words.
The planner view →Legacy hazardous materials are in your assets. Routine work is what disturbs them.
Asset owners carry asbestos in AC pipe, lagging and sheeting, plus lead paint and silica. The register usually sits in spreadsheets and PDFs that nobody checks before the dig, the cut or the strip-out.
The register isn’t a control
A spreadsheet doesn’t warn a crew about to cut into an AC main. The hazard data has to reach the work order before work starts.
Waste & competency gaps
Asbestos waste must be tracked to a licensed facility, and removalists must hold current licences. Manual processes miss both.
No defensible record
When a claim lands years later you need a tamper-evident trail of who knew what, and when, not reconstructed paperwork.
One question before any dig, cut or strip-out: is it safe to work here?
The verdict follows the job type, not just the material’s condition: a routine excavation over a sound asbestos-cement main still returns HOLD. It fails safe: CLEAR appears only where the area has a recorded survey. HazardIQ flags, gates and evidences; your people stay responsible.
Illustrative flow with synthetic data.
A work order, checked before the crew moves.
A 22-second walkthrough, then two of the screens behind it. Everything shown is synthetic demo data.
Not another EAM. The compliance layer on the one you have.
Your EAM and GIS (Maximo, SAP, TechnologyOne, Esri) stay the system of record. HazardIQ is the hazardous-materials decision layer on top: it reads your functional-location and equipment master and hands crews and planners a defensible verdict. It complements your EAM and GIS; it does not replace them.
The gap the platforms leave
EAMs track the asset. GIS shows where it is. Neither answers the question a supervisor has at 7am: is it safe to open this one, today, for this job? HazardIQ answers it and records the evidence.
Integrate, don’t compete
Adapters for SAP S/4HANA PM/EAM, IBM Maximo and TechnologyOne are tested on recorded work-order data. A live check in your non-production system is part of every pilot.
What is built, stated plainly.
CAP, XSUAA, HANA, single-tenant isolation
Line-of-sight and six quality dimensions; not a certification
Tamper-evident change log, tested, fail-closed
S/4 read-through, GeoJSON feature layer
Every claim has a status. See what is tested, and what is not →
Bring one site and one work order.
A 45-minute working session. We load a sample of your data into the register, score its data quality and run a real HOLD / CAUTION / CLEAR check on it. Loading a full register is a separate, scoped step.
Book a working session
