Hazardous-materials compliance · SAP BTP or standalone
Know what’s in the asset before the crew opens it.
HazardIQ turns a static asbestos & hazardous-materials register into a
HOLD / CAUTION / CLEAR verdict at the moment work is about to happen — hung off your real asset
hierarchy, on the platform you already run.
SAP CAP · XSUAA · HANAEsri-ready GeoJSONAligned to ISO 55001 · ISO 8000-8
matchedAsbestos (bonded) · GOOD · confirmed buffer 50m
whyIntrusive job within controlled buffer of a registered ACM occurrence.
actionPermit-to-work + licensed controls before disturbance.
noteEvidence, not duty — the PCBU remains responsible for WHS compliance. Illustrative, synthetic data.
See it in 30 seconds
A work order, checked before the crew moves.
22 seconds, captioned. It starts only when you press play. Synthetic demo data.
The problem
Your biggest asbestos risk is buried, out of sight, and disturbed by routine work.
Asset owners carry vast legacy asbestos — AC pipe, lagging, sheeting, lead paint, silica. The register usually lives in spreadsheets and PDFs that nobody checks before the dig, the cut or the strip-out.
The register isn’t a control
A spreadsheet doesn’t flag a crew about to cut into an AC main. The hazard data has to reach the work order before work starts.
Waste & competency gaps
Asbestos waste must be tracked to a licensed facility, and removalists must hold current licences. Manual processes miss both.
No defensible record
When a claim lands years later you need a tamper-evident trail of who knew what, and when — not reconstructed paperwork.
How it works · the differentiator
“Dial before you dig” — the control a spreadsheet can’t give you.
Before any excavation, drill, cut or strip-out, HazardIQ answers one question: is it safe to work here? The verdict follows the job type, not just the material’s condition — a routine excavation over a sound asbestos-cement main still returns HOLD. It fails safe: CLEAR appears only where the area has a recorded survey. HazardIQ flags, gates and evidences; your people stay responsible.
Illustrative flow with synthetic data. HazardIQ flags, gates and evidences; the duty-holder remains responsible for WHS compliance.
The product itself, one scenario: a water utility.
Screens captured from the demo instance. Every site, work order and figure is synthetic.
hazardiq · work-order safety check · demo data
Work-order check. An excavation over an asbestos-cement main returns HOLD, with the reasons and the controls.
hazardiq · hazard map · demo data
Hazard map. Occurrences plotted by risk tier, with layers for sites, hazards and survey coverage.
hazardiq · hazard register · demo data
Hazard register. Every occurrence by site, hazard type and material, filterable by condition and risk tier.
hazardiq · evidence check log · demo data
Evidence log. Every check recorded with its verdict, the rule version in force and a hash chained to the previous entry.
hazardiq · waste chain of custody · demo data
Waste chain of custody. Each load balanced from generated to collected, received and disposed, with gaps flagged.
Where it fits
Not another EAM. The compliance layer on the one you have.
Maximo, SAP EAM, TechnologyOne, Hexagon and Esri are the system of record for your assets. HazardIQ is the hazardous-materials decision layer that sits on top — it reads your functional-location and equipment master, and hands your crews and planners a defensible verdict. It complements your EAM/GIS; it doesn’t replace it. It also runs standalone.
SAP EAM / PM→HazardIQ→Esri ArcGIS·work order in, HOLD/CAUTION/CLEAR out, occurrence on the map.
The gap the platforms leave
EAMs track the asset. GIS shows where it is. Neither answers the question a supervisor has at 7am: is it safe to open this one, today, for this job? HazardIQ answers it — and records the evidence.
Integrate, don’t compete
Adapters for SAP S/4HANA PM/EAM, IBM Maximo and TechnologyOne are tested on recorded work-order data; a live check in your non-production system is part of every pilot.
For your role
Five people decide. Each gets their argument.
An EAM-compliance purchase is decided by a committee. Pick your seat — the pain, the capability and the evidence are written in your language.
What each role sees
Executives & Officers
A live view of active register items, high-risk items, overdue reviews and work orders on HOLD, each backed by a record you can verify.
WHS & Compliance
The statutory register, management plan and regulator visit pack, generated from live data, with every check kept as evidence.
Asset & Engineering Managers
Hazards, sites and survey coverage on one map, linked to your functional locations and equipment, so unknowns become a survey programme.
Maintenance Planners · work management
Each work order returns HOLD, CAUTION or CLEAR in the system you already use, with the reason in plain words.
EAM, GIS & IT Leads
Adapters for SAP S/4HANA PM, Maximo and TechnologyOne, proven against recorded interfaces; your live connection is part of the pilot.
Environment & Waste Officers
Each consignment linked to its removal job, transporter and receiving facility, with a mass balance and chain-of-custody gaps flagged.
Field Crews & Contractors
A safety brief for the job: the hazards nearby, the controls, and who is on call.
The argument for each seat
END USER & CHAMPION · owns the daily reality
You inherited a hierarchy nobody fully trusts and an asbestos register that’s three surveys out of date. Every refurbishment starts with a scramble to find out what’s in the wall.
✓The hazardous-materials register hangs off your functional-location hierarchy — occurrences roll up to sites and FL/EQ, versioned survey-by-survey so you always see the latest of N.
✓A data-quality score you can see per site — so you know which parts of the register to trust before you plan against them.
✓Condition, risk tier and next-review clocks maintained automatically — less spreadsheet archaeology, fewer surprises on site.
TECHNICAL EVALUATOR · owns integration & the data model
I’m the one who has to make it talk to SAP PM and the Esri feature services — without another bespoke integration that rots in eighteen months.
✓Native SAP BTP — CAP (Node), XSUAA, HANA, single-tenant data isolation. Not a bolt-on hosted elsewhere and stitched back in.
✓Reads your functional-location / equipment master over a BTP Destination (released S/4 OData); writes back only what you authorise. Geometry as GeoJSON, ready for an ArcGIS feature layer.
✓Additive-only data model, quality dimensions aligned to ISO 8000-8, correlation-ID tracing, audit-log emission, SBOM. Boring where boring is a feature.
I can’t sign off on data I can’t measure, and I can’t defend a decision I can’t trace.
✓Data quality scored on six dimensions aligned to ISO 8000-8 — completeness, validity, uniqueness, consistency, timeliness and a reference-conformance accuracy proxy — per register, with the offending records named.
✓Line-of-sight aligned to ISO 55001 from policy to the work order; a tamper-evident field-level change log on every record — who changed what, when.
✓Every verdict carries its evidence and the “evidence, not duty” notice. We flag, gate and measure — compliance stays with the duty-holder.
*proxy: reference-conformance + range plausibility. True accuracy needs a verified source. Synthetic demo data.
COMMERCIAL GATE · owns vendor risk
I’ve read a hundred capability statements that don’t survive contact with the evaluation matrix.
✓Evidence built to your criteria, not to the brochure — security, data protection, standards alignment and integration, each with its status stated plainly (see the claim-status table).
✓Testable claims: automated test suite, SBOM, audit log, org isolation — in a form you can drop into a response schedule.
✓We say what is not done: no independent penetration test or IRAP assessment yet.
HazardIQ sits beside your EAM and GIS, not in front of them. It read-through-merges your functional-location and equipment master, keeps the hazard occurrences and their verdicts, and publishes geometry your ArcGIS estate can consume. Additive-only, org-isolated, audit-logged end to end.
A 45-minute working session: bring one site and one work order. We load a sample of your data into the register, score its data quality, and run a real HOLD / CAUTION / CLEAR check on it. Loading a full register is a separate, scoped step.
